Reusing Non-Agricultural Source Material (NASM) to Optimize Agricultural Nutrient Management

Soils are more important to us than we realize, but they are often taken for granted. Around the world, farmers strive for sustainable, productive agricultural soils. In 2015, we celebrated the International Year of Soils as designated by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). In FAO’s “The Status of the World’s Soil Resources”, it was reported that soils are deteriorating. They attributed this to a number of factors including:

  • soil erosion,
  • nutrient depletion,
  • loss of organic carbon,
  • over application of mineral fertilizers and pesticides, and
  • declining soil biodiversity.

Further recognition was given by the International Union of Soil Sciences (IUSS) when it declared 2015-2024 the “decade of soils” in an effort to bring more attention to soil’s fundamental role in sustaining human life.

Desertification of Soils Trend and the Nutrient Management Act

Desertification of soils has been an ongoing concern in Canada, specifically in Ontario and Quebec, as soils continue to lose organic matter.

In short, we need to do more to build our soils and we need to do it better. In Ontario, we’ve been working with the Nutrient Management Act (NMA) for over 6 years now. The act and associated regulations ensure that any nutrient rich material (with the exception of fertilizer) is used in a beneficial manner that’s protective of the environment. Non-Agricultural Source Material (NASM) which is nutrient rich material includes manures, biosolids, food and beverage waste, and other non-agricultural source materials. The NMA has provided direction and a push in the right direction for sustainability and environmental responsibility.

The Importance of Biosolids as a NASM

Biosolids is one type of NASM that is key to improving our soils. The land application of biosolids has been going strong for over 50 years in Ontario. They provide many of the same macro and micro nutrients as well as organic matter that are found in manure. The importance of biosolids in agricultural nutrient management is well established and supported by government and academia. The quality of biosolids has continually improved with many municipalities further processing their biosolids into sailable fertilizer product.

Over the past couple of years, there has been a renewed interest in using NASM in different ways:

  • Renewable natural gas,
  • Electricity generation, or
  • Biochar production.

In each instance, a portion of the processed material creates a residual that needs to be managed, typically through beneficial use on agricultural land.

Biosolids Land Application Alternative to Landfills

In Canada, over 2.5 million wet tonnes of biosolids are produced each year. Historically about 25% of that material was taken to landfill, with the remainder either used on agricultural land (35%) or incinerated (40%). Additionally, 34 million tonnes of municipal and industrial waste is generated each year of which only 8 million tonnes (25%) is recycled.

As the province moves towards a more sustainable future, biosolids and other organic materials are becoming coveted resources rather than wastes. New legislation is forcing this change in Ontario with the Waste Free Ontario Act. A renewed focus on reuse has come to the forefront. With diversion goals of 30% by 2020 and up to 80% by 2050, biosolids and other organic resources will no longer be permitted in landfills. Other provinces have already banned organics in landfills.

While biosolids land application and other NASM will increase over the coming years, it will remain a viable and desirable option for municipalities. Only 15% of Ontario’s land base would be needed to use all the biosolids produced in the province beneficially, leaving 85% of the agricultural land available to receive other soil amendments therefore there is a lot of room for growth.

There are additional benefits as returning organic matter to our soils will reduce our carbon footprint through carbon sequestering while simultaneously increasing yields and improving soil resilience. A 1% increase in soil organic matter is approximated to 5.8 tons/acre of sequestered carbon. A study in Michigan also showed a crop-yield increase of about 12% for every 1% increase in soil organic matter.

Biosolids land application produces positive results with both crop production and environmental sustainability. To see biosolids land application in action, check out the Case Study: Brant County. 



Biosolids Case Study- Brant County

Project- Highlights

In the summer of 2012 after wheat harvest, Wessuc injected liquid biosolids in the South East corner of a farm located in Brant County Ontario.

Process- Highlights

Due to unforeseen circumstances, we were unable to apply the entire usable area. While it was disappointing to leave areas of the field without biosolids it provided the opportunity to collect crop response comparison data. Using Google Earth imagery and yield monitoring data of the biosolids injected vs. the farmer’s attempt to match the fertility levels of those biosolids commercially we were able to track the crop yield response.

Outcome- Highlights

The area where biosolids were applied showed a significantly positive yield response compared to the areas that received other amendments.

Economic Advantages- Highlights

The farmer ultimately experienced an increase in profits by using biosolids vs. commercially available amendments.

Download the Brant County Case Study

Find out more about Wessuc’s land application services.

Best Practices for Excess Soil Management

In the province of Ontario how do we manage excess soil?

Over 25 million cubic metres of excess soil needs to be managed each year in Ontario. In 2014 the province issued a Best Management Practice to guide the  industry in how to best manage excess soils in order to protect the environment and promote beneficial reuse, but it had little effect. In 2017 the province pushed this initiative farther by releasing a regulatory proposal for Excess Soil Management. The initial intent was to implement the regulatory framework by Jan 1, 2018. Thankfully the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change has listened to many of the comments they received from their ERB posting and have committed to a number of changes for the implementation and focus of the regulation:

1) An ammended phased-in approach for the regulation was put forth, implementing reuse standards in 2020 and excess soil management plans and registry requirements in 2021;

2) A recognition that excess soil should be seen first and foremost as a resource rather than a waste;

3) And changes to what triggers an Excess Soil Management Plan (ESMP) being required.

For further details on excess soil management take a look at the following presentation by the Province of Ontario Ministry of Environment and Climate Change from the Canadian Urban Institute Symposium in 2017.


Making the Right Choice for Dewatering of Sludge

Is there a “right choice” for dewatering of sludge?

Many manufacturers will be quick to highlight the features and benefits of their technology over a competitor’s. Whether it is % solids achievable, polymer dosage required, throughput available, automation, ease of maintenance, energy costs, odor capture or a plethora of other options. It is easy to focus in on one benefit or feature and lose the sight of the big picture.

The truth is there is no right choice for the dewatering of sludge. Instead there is a right process for determining what dewatering technology or technologies will work best for your needs and it starts not with the technology, but with the sludge itself.

Dewatering of Sludge Trends vs. Individual Sludge Assessment and Solutions

It is true that trends exist in the industry like those highlighted in the article How Do I Choose the Best Option for Sludge Dewatering? Those trends exist for a reason. Facilities with similar types of sludge and related needs will tend to required similar solutions.

The overview provided in the article isn’t wrong but starting with a trend to determine the sludge dewatering process required can yield poor results. Your dewatering solution may require more than just the selection of a dewatering technology but may also involve sludge pre-treatment or other changes to your sludge collection and management process.

The Ideal Process for Dewatering of Sludge

The best process for dewatering sludge involves a few steps:

  1. Assess sludge characteristics
  2. Establish dewatering goals and factors affecting the desired outcome
  3. Identify and select the best techniques and technologies available to achieve goals
  4. Implement dewatering of sludge technologies and techniques
  5. Evaluate success of the dewatering implementation against goals

Each individual sludge situation will have different characteristics and understanding these characteristics is the first step to determine which technology you should choose. Once the sludge characteristics are known and understood, the next step is to clearly define the desired goals and factors affecting the goals. Some may suggest the goals should be defined first, but it is impossible to define realistic goals without knowing what you have in the first place. Often the goals may be the same from one facility to another but the factors affecting them such as volumes, disposal cost, energy cost, or maintenance capabilities will vary significantly. Knowing the sludge characteristics and the desired outcome(s) will ensure the big picture remains in sight while different technology features and benefits are being evaluated. The final steps in the process are to implement and gauge the success. Rolling these learnings into the future dewatering of sludge process will be key to improved success down the road.

The Right Choice for Dewatering of Sludge is All About the Process

So, in order to make the best choice for dewatering of sludge, it is important to focus on the process first and allow the technology and equipment choices to be informed by the sludge assessment and defined goals.

To find out more about how following the process delivers results, check out Wessuc’s Lagoon Dewatering Case Study or contact us.